In May of 2022, NRLC led more than 70 state, national, and international pro-life organizations in issuing an open letter to the nation’s legislators. We urged them to reject legislation and policy initiatives that would impose criminal penalties on women who have abortions. The argument put forth in that letter still stands.

A bombshell study published Monday has revealed nearly 11% of women experience severe or life-threatening complications after an abortion via the drug mifepristone – a rate that is 22 times higher than indicated on the drug’s label approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

It breaks my heart to learn the news when an innocent newborn has been mercilessly discarded in a dumpster like garbage. I believe most New Mexicans, regardless of political affiliation, feel the same way. Unfortunately, situations such as this have the potential to be avoided if not for the road blocking which Democrat lawmakers in the Roundhouse have done to proposed fixes to our state’s Safe Haven for Infants Act. 

Please Like & Subscribe to our Youtube Channel, we are trying to grow our audience so we can increase our reach and help spread our message.  

Pro-Abortion legislators fervently fought these proposed changes, preferring dead babies to being perceived as taking a pro-life stance.  Today they got wat they wanted - A newborn baby was found dead in a Albuquerque dumpster. 

Still, the falling numbers hint that attitudes may be shifting. Whether due to local advocacy or changing hearts and minds, New Mexico’s declining abortion rate may point to a quiet but growing movement toward life.

At every level of government—local, state, and federal—pro-abortion Democrats fiercely opposed any legislation that would require administering the same level of medical care to an abortion survivor as they would to any other baby of the same gestational age. And why would you? These live births either (a) are a fantasy of pro-lifers’ imagination, (b) so rare as not to require the “heavy hand/blunt instrument” of legislation, or (c) only involve children who are going to “die anyway.”

Following an abortion, grief is much more common, and more intensely felt, than relief, according to a new study of a random sample of American women.

These new findings starkly contradict the claim of Planned Parenthood that “Over 95% of people who have had abortions say that they mostly felt relief after their abortion.”

Compared to women who had miscarriages or other natural pregnancy losses, women who had abortions had similar levels of grief, depression, and anxiety.  But the latter reported much higher levels of guilt, shame, and regret.

She was haunted by the reality of what she had done. Every kick she had once felt, every heartbeat she had seen on the ultrasound—it was all gone. And there was nothing she could do to bring them back.

Much has been written about how euthanasia in Canada has been used as a cost-saving method because it’s cheaper for the government to offer assisted dying than healthcare to disabled people.

Canada has government-run healthcare, and the Canadian government seeks to save money by withholding care to chronically ill people, leaving many to consider euthanasia as their only choice.

What is less known is that the same thing has been happening in the United States. Only it’s not the government that is trying to save money, but private insurance companies.

Last month, it was reported that the Trump administration was looking to freeze family planning funding, potentially stripping Planned Parenthood of $20 million in federal taxpayer dollars. Now, that report has been proven accurate.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, a hugely important case that could decide whether South Carolina and potentially other pro-life states can direct Medicaid funds  away from abortion providers such as Planned Parenthood.

The last-minute addition was made without public input, sparking strong opposition from Republican lawmakers and pro-life advocates who argue that taxpayer dollars should not be used to expand abortion access. Despite their objections, the bill passed the New Mexico House of Representatives by a 41-25 vote and now moves to the state Senate.

“A new study has found that a key part of the brain involved in forming speech is firing away in babies as they listen to voices around them. This may represent a sort of mental rehearsal leading up to the true milestone that occurs after only a year of life: baby’s first words.”

In New Mexico, too many women facing unexpected pregnancies feel alone, unsupported, and pressured into choices they might not otherwise make. Financial hardships, lack of child care, unstable relationships, or simply fear of the unknown often push women toward abortion—not because it’s what they want, but because they feel they have no other option.

Abortion leaves indelible footprints in the texture of masculinity, in the recesses of a man’s heart, and in his reproductive history. A father is a father forever, even of a dead unborn child.

There are other pro-life executive orders in the works which we will inform you of as soon as they are made.

In a new opinion column out today, Senator Josh Hawley advocates for President Donald Trump to prioritize reinstating pro-life policies that were reversed during Joe Biden’s administration. He says Trump should quickly overturn Biden’s radical abortion agenda so Americans are not forced to promote abortions and the abortion industry with their tax dollars.

The recent ruling by the New Mexico Supreme Court against pro-life city and county ordinances comes as no surprise, the Courts is composed of anti-natalist activists. 

As the frontlines for abortion have continued to change leading up to and since the 2022 overturn of Roe v. Wade, the consideration for the dignity and safety of women who find themselves pondering abortion is fading further and further into oblivion. Troubling developments in abortion commerce are compounding the impact of abortion on women.